Home›RADIO›The Shad Olson Show, September 3, 2020

The Shad Olson Show, September 3, 2020

September 3, 2020

2265

Unique, enlightening and intelligent conservative talk radio with Emmy-winning investigative reporter, published author and broadcast veteran, Shad Olson.

60 DAYS AND COUNTING: Will America Pass or Fail an Intelligence Test Regarding the Continued Survival of the Nation?

–Attorney General William Barr destroys CNN Wolf Blitzer on the issue of mail-in balloting and the potential for fraud. Barr quotes Jimmy Carter in a common sense call for reason regarding mail in balloting in a deeply but very closely divided electorate.

“Absentee and mail-in ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.”–Former President Jimmy Carter, Chairman of 2005 Commission on Federal Election Reform.

–The Darwin Test question of America’s present cultural divide is whether a majority of people most directly threatened and impacted by unhinged mob violence in urban centers and surrounding suburbs will continue to vote for the policies and politicians that have created this societal breakdown.If the answer is “Yes,” there is no amount of debate that will avert the destruction of this nation, either by fully realized civil war or by the political overwhelming of red flyover states by displaced blue state refugees.

–Will Donald Trump’s historic economic resurgence continue or will America be plunged into the designed collapse and chaos of the intentional destruction of the globalist totalitarian vision?

–One day after Shad Olson issued a volatility warning for an overvalued stock market, the DOW loses over 800 points in early trading. Money managers and market data indicators are telling the truth. The American 2020 election is the most risk-laden reversal moment in U.S. history. VIX shows massive hedging propensity in current market, indicating that investors see a Biden victory as a Death Swan event for an already mortally wounded American marketplace.

–What if the Edison/Tesla argument over AC or DC electricity had taken place in today’s atmosphere of immovably entrenched emotionalism? The contest of ideas and ideals that has been the nerve system of optimized human innovation for centuries doesn’t require emotional input. It does however require intellectual honesty by all players and a commitment to acknowledging the superior argument when presented.