Health experts now predict the much maligned millennial generation may soon top the charts in HIV and AIDS infection rates due to increased rates of “risky,” sexual practices like anal sex, online hookups, Tinder dates and unprotected intercourse where condoms are seen as “uncool.”

British doctor and National Health Service sexual health consultant, Dr. Peter Greenhouse tells the Daily Star newspaper that online dating apps and a dim view of protected sex as detracting from pleasure are contributing to conditions ripe for what he calls a “nuclear chain reaction,” of promiscuous behaviors with very predictable results. The stage is set for a social tragedy that reads like a trip back to the 1980’s in a time capsule.

“Dating apps increase how quickly people can change from one partner to the next or have concurrent relationships,” Dr Greenhouse explained.

“It’s much easier to do that with the likes of Tinder – compared to before where you’d have to meet people face-to-face or on Facebook etc.

“The app takes the initial embarrassment away and means they are far more likely to start new relationships.

“There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with that but [Tinder users] are changing partners more frequently which means by definition there will be more infections.”

While falling marriage rates and millennials unabashed embrace of permanent single life are no suprise, also contributing to potentially disastrous precursors of an HIV epidemic in the millennial generation, increasing fondness for and near fixation with anal intercourse by young millennial couples whom statistics suggest, engage in female receptive anal sex play at rates unseen in previous generations.

Statistics tell us these teens and young adults are engaging in exactly the range of sexual behaviors, promiscuity and rapid partner turnover that led to the HIV and AIDS epidemic in homosexuals in the 1980’s and 1990’s. It should be surprise to no one to predict that the risks, outcomes and tolls to personal health and societal impact will be the same or similar.”

A 2017 survey of over 3,000 sexually active millennials shows that 35 percent of women and 15 percent of men are now engaging in receptive anal sex “at least some of the time.”

In just the past six years, online pornography streaming sites like SEXM.XXX or similar others like them seem to be in popularity among both genders for accessing adult content. There has been seen a 400% rise in the demand for male-female anal sex search results, with female receptive anal sex videos consistently outpacing vaginal intercourse in ranking as the most viewed and highest rated clips on various porn sites similar to Porno 71. Moreover, if pornography is not enough, there are other ways for people to attain sexual relief. If people are bored of watching couples have sex, they can look at different variations of pornography like cam girls and adult games as well.

In the case of live free cams where hundreds of women stream overtly sexual content for anyone to watch online, this trend may be picking up as well. But, there does not seem to be a dip in demand for general sexual shenanigans on online cams and sexual intercourse videos, which at least points to the fact that this fixation with oral penetration may not catch on for longer. However, the possibilities of it cannot be dismissed.

Last year, Teen Vogue magazine arrived at family mailboxes with instructions to teenage girls on how to properly lube up and relax their backsides for an enjoyable experience in losing their “anal virginity.” The article entitled, “Anal Sex: What you need to know” resulted in subscription cancellations, online rants and plenty of motherly (and fatherly) outrage captured on YouTube and social media videos.

“Statistics tell us these teens and young adults are engaging in exactly the range of sexual behaviors, promiscuity and rapid partner turnover that led to the HIV and AIDS epidemic in homosexuals in the 1980’s and 1990’s,” an anonymous medical professional offered.

“It should be surprise to no one to predict that the risks, outcomes and tolls to personal health and societal impact will be exactly the same or similar.”

Read more: