The Shad Olson Show, October 8, 2020

Unique, enlightening and intelligent conservative talk radio with Emmy-winning investigative reporter, published author and broadcast veteran, Shad Olson.

Pence Devours Kamala Harris in VP Debate, Left Fixates on a Fly on Pence’s Hair: Given Health Issues for Biden and Trump Are These Two Candidates the Likely President in 2021?

With calm deliberation and firm resolve, Mike Pence makes Kamala Harris choke on her own tongue. Kamala’s boss bitch routine falls flat when there’s an adult in the room with a memory and an unflappable glint in his eye. Mike Pence is not Beto O’Rourke or Pete Buttboy. There were nice moments throughout, but getting Harris to publicly support and defend fracking is a huge blow to the most energized portion of the Democrat base. Pence forced Kamala to the middle to keep Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia fossil fuels voters in play. (And please, Madame Mao, explain how you expect to simultaneously reenter the Paris Climate accords and remain pro-fracking in domestic energy policy.)

Click red links below to launch segments in separate player page.

Hour 1.

The Shad Olson Show October 8, 2020 Segment 1–Pence Dominates VP Debate
The Shad Olson Show October 8, 2020 Segment 2–Kamala Churlish and Shrill
The Shad Olson Show October 8, 2020 Segment 3–Trump is NOT Out of the COVID Woods
The Shad Olson Show October 8, 2020 Segment 4–Police Criticized Even for Non-Lethal Force

Hour 2.

The Shad Olson Show October 8, 2020 Segment 5–DECLAS but Still No Arrests
The Shad Olson Show October 8, 2020 Segment 6–SpyGate NON Revelations
The Shad Olson Show October 8, 2020 Segment 7–Trump’s COVID Recovery
The Shad Olson Show October 8, 2020 Segment 8–Big Mike Calls Riots, Violence a Hoax

————————————————–

–In the postmortem VP debate analysis on ABC News Wednesday night, Clinton crime syndicate employee and sometimes news anchor, George Stephanopolous accused Vice President Mike Pence of interrupting and “mansplaining a few times” to Kamala Harris. A ridiculous assertion.

To her credit and journalistic integrity, fellow ABC analyst Martha Raddatz would have nothing of it, dismissing the notion rightly as flatly insulting to both candidates, saying that Kamala Harris is a longtime legal prosecutor and a candidate for Vice President and that while she is indeed a woman, any man in her position or in the Vice President’s has the choice to interrupt their opponent at any time during any debate and that treating Harris differently or more softly because of her gender would have been blatantly sexist.

Bullseye.

-A crude bioweapon would wipe out large numbers of an enemy nation’s population, leave no doubt it was an intentionally deployed weapon of war, inviting disproportionate scale of retaliation, consolidating an opponent’s population in their opposition against your nation and strengthening an enemy’s unified resolve to defeat you and exact material and military recompense.

–A sophisticated bioweapon on the other hand, would be indistinguishable from a flu virus, kill dozens of times more people than an annual flu season, leave ample room for ambiguity and debate about origins, causes of death, scale of pandemic and severity of sickness, thoroughly confuse an already divided enemy nation about appropriate levels of response, take natural advantage of existing political divisions to deepen societal chaos and confusion for military and economic advantage, convincing the population to blame their own leadership for hundreds of thousands of deaths (that they can’t agree are really happening) while inflicting potentially dozens of undetected genetic and microbiological alterations to their population and fast tracking a vaccine intrusion as the second half of a binary weapon rollout.

A sophisticated bioweapons deployment might do all of that, leading to political regime change via economic depletion and societal discord… resulting in a brand new government more friendly and accommodating to our enemy, making it possible to resume their march toward global domination. And the ultimate defeat of the targeted country.

Instead, we argued for nine months about masks and lockdowns and bodybags with one side insisting the only way to defeat the virus was to minimize it to nothing and pretend that no one really died. With the other side pointing fingers at Trump and calling his supporters science deniers, antimaskers and rubes.

In other words, we all did exactly what the Chinese and the Deep State hoped we would do. We ignored them, fought with each other and fulfilled their plan.

Will Donald Trump’s historic economic resurgence continue or will America be plunged into the designed collapse and chaos of the intentional destruction of the globalist totalitarian vision?

Click red links below to launch segments in separate player page.

Hour 1.

Hour 2.